For the blog this week, I decided to find a critique of a movie. I decided to see how people critiqued “Jurassic World” since it is the 4th movie in it’s franchise and the first movie to come out in its franchise since 2001 (Jurassic Park III). The review is located here.
The review starts out by listing everything a generic monster movie has for its plot. From the main characters wanting to play God, to some of the main characters not wanting to mess with the natural order of things. The review goes on to say how you don’t need your brain to watch this movie because it is so painfully simple. It goes on to explain the plot of the movie describing the park, the things you can do at the park, and the characters in the movie. The review uses some comedy because the point of the movie is a group of scientists creating a super dinosaur. The review says something about how creating a new dinosaur is a great idea and then sarcastically says what could possibly go wrong. The last half of the review goes on to list the main characters and the actors who play them. It then lists how good their character was in the movie.
I thought this movie critique was good and it was fair. I have seen the movie myself and I agree with most of the things said in it. The movie had a lot of action and excitement, but its not anything super special. It’s just your basic monster movie that happens to be a Jurassic Park movie. However I do like the use of sarcasm in the critique. Especially when they said creating a new dinosaur was a great idea.
Critique plays a vital role when it comes to public relations. People who use public relations would never know if they are crossing any lines without critiques. People who critique keep public relations people in check. Although sometimes, people who critique are just people who like finding the bad in everything.
quinlanbowler 